Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk

Main pageTalk pageSubmissions
Reviewing instructions
Helper script

Welcome to the Wikipedia Articles for Creation help desk

  • This page is only for questions about article submissions to Wikipedia. Are you in the right place?
  • For your own security, please do not provide your email address or other contact details. Answers will be provided on this page; we are unable to provide answers via email.
  • Please keep in mind that we are all volunteers, and sometimes a reply may take a little time. Your patience is appreciated.
  • Bona fide reviewers at Articles for Creation will never contact or solicit anyone for payment to get a draft into article space, improve a draft, or restore a deleted article. If someone contacts you with such an offer, please post on this help desk page.
Click here to ask a new question.

A reviewer should soon answer your question on this page. Please check back often.
Skip to today's questions · Skip to the bottom · Archived discussions


September 15[edit]

19:54:16, 15 September 2019 review of submission by 2401:4900:43AF:7B15:0:2F:D3AE:2A01[edit]

2401:4900:43AF:7B15:0:2F:D3AE:2A01 (talk) 19:54, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

September 16[edit]

08:25:04, 16 September 2019 review of draft by Neilkvaughan[edit]

We are trying to get the company page (above) published, but require some help. We were informed that it was not written from a neutral point of view, so we have re-worded this now. We were also informed that there were not enough references/links, so we have added a few more. Could you advise anything else we can do to get this page live?

Kind Regards Neil

Neilkvaughan (talk) 08:25, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi Neilkvaughan. Please clarify what you mean by "we". The policy on Wikipedia is "one user—one account". Usernames should not be shared by multiple individuals. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:19, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
@Neilkvaughan: And please read WP:SELFCITE. Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 09:39, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

10:29:03, 16 September 2019 review of draft by Chiragragijani[edit]

i want save this page because Actor Ragi jani is my father & how will i know this page is accepted

Chiragragijani (talk) 10:29, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

@Chiragragijani: if the subject is your father, you have a Conflict of interest. If the draft gets accepted, you will get a notification on your user talk page. Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 09:37, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

15:12:05, 16 September 2019 review of draft by DriverSafety[edit]

Hello. I am being paid to write an article on my company for Wiki. It has been declined by one reviewer, in part, from what I understand, because he/she believes the subject of the article lacks notability. I studied the Wiki standards for notability for a corporation and prepared an analysis of why I think my submission meets these standards. By using the grid on the Wiki site for the criteria of Significance, Independence, Reliability, and Secondary sourcing, I determined that 16 of the 21 references in the article pass the test of notability for corporations, the remainder are background references that provide context for the article.

I have several questions. 1. Do I send my analysis to the reviewer who declined my article? Another reviewer advised against this. 2. Two newspaper articles that I referenced exclusively featured my company. One is behind a firewall and the other is in French. How can a reviewer determine notability if they cannot access or read the references? 3. If my COI status is an impediment to acceptance, can I give the draft article and reference material to someone in the Wiki community to write the article for me?

Your advice will be most appreciated. DriverSafety (talk) 15:12, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

DriverSafety (talk) 15:12, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

My decline notice quite clearly says "This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia" and it still does, this is why you are strongly encouraged not to create articles about your own company. Theroadislong (talk) 15:17, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Request on 15:31:29, 16 September 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Rmurenzi[edit]

Greetings. I created an article Jean-Paul Gazeau in March. I was informed that the article read too much like a CV. I assumed therefore that the article was rejected. In August I created a new article draft, same file name, but revised to address concerns expressed by the editors. Recently I was informed that this new draft was rejected because "the article appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Jean-Paul Gazeau, which is also waiting to be reviewed." How shall I advance with this?

  • Substitute the new text into the original document?
  • Delete the original document and resubmit the second-created document?
  • Or?

I will be most grateful for your advice. Thank you.

Rmurenzi (talk) 15:31, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi Rmurenzi. In future, don't start a new page when you want to make revisions. The decline of User:Rmurenzi/sandbox/Jean-Pierre Gazeau as a duplicate of Draft:Jean-Pierre Gazeau was incorrect. That reason would apply only if Draft:Jean-Pierre Gazeau were also awaiting review, which it wasn't. Therefore the decline of the sandbox has been reverted, it is back in its place in the "queue", and will be reviewed on its merits in due course (the backlog stands at 5 months). You don't have to do anything about the old draft, it will likely be deleted shortly as stale. When that happens, it's possible that someone will move the sandbox, don't let that confuse you. --Worldbruce (talk) 17:06, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

17:33:28, 16 September 2019 review of draft by TVaughanSoCal[edit]

TVaughanSoCal (talk) 17:33, 16 September 2019 (UTC) Hello, Please help...The individual my article is about is a founding member of a 40 year old punk rock band. The band (including his name) is all over Wikipedia and other members have their own articles. I've followed the suggesstions and added several more references from viable sources that are facts from interviews, press, movie appearnaces etc...and it was declined again...HELP please getting frustrated. Thank you kindly. TvaughanSoCal

Hi TVaughanSoCal. One of the reviewers pointed you to the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics. They could have saved you some frustration by pointing out the specific guideline that is relevant. Members of notable bands (e.g. T.S.O.L.) are redirected to the article about the band, not given individual articles, unless they have demonstrated individual notability for activity independent of the band. Roche is notable only in connection with T.S.O.L., so there will be no stand alone article about Roche.
Other members of the band may have individual articles because they've done something for which they're notable outside the band (solo releases that have attracted significant critical attention, for example). Or having their own articles may be a mistake, perhaps no one has gotten around to redirecting them. See the essay "Other stuff exists" to help understand why it's irrelevant to this draft whether there are articles about other members of the band or not. --Worldbruce (talk) 22:46, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

18:02:57, 16 September 2019 review of submission by Trevcarver[edit]

I have revised the page with proper cites that validate the page. Please let me know what is incorrect as this is my first posting Trevcarver (talk) 18:02, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

On hold pending paid editing disclosure, see User talk:Trevcarver#Declare any connection. --Worldbruce (talk) 22:58, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

21:33:43, 16 September 2019 review of draft by DriverSafety[edit]

DriverSafety (talk) 21:33, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

FYI. This morning, I asked several questions about defending or resubmitting a declined article Draft: Virage Simulation. I have since resubmitted the much-edited article. So, for the time being, those questions are no longer pertinent.

ThanksDriverSafety (talk) 21:33, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

21:34:20, 16 September 2019 review of submission by[edit]

This person is one of the biggest youtubers. He is very famous and there are man youtubers with less subscribers than him with a wikipedia page. Do your research he is very famous among teens and people in their 20s (talk) 21:34, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

23:45:55, 16 September 2019 review of submission by Kikiramomobami[edit]

Kikiramomobami (talk) 23:45, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

September 17[edit]

00:04:08, 17 September 2019 review of submission by FunnyTomato227[edit]

FunnyTomato227 (talk) 00:04, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

@FunnyTomato227: - thus far the subject hasn't received any suitable coverage - even the buzzfeed article is by a community contributor and not vetted by the editorial staff, so isn't reliable. Once either the book or site is finished, additional coverage may be made. This should not be resubmitted until that additional, suitable, coverage is made. Nosebagbear (talk) 14:07, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

02:49:00, 17 September 2019 review of submission by Kikiramomobami[edit]

Kikiramomobami (talk) 02:49, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Duplicate - there is an open pending question just above this one Nosebagbear (talk) 14:04, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

02:49:12, 17 September 2019 review of submission by Kikiramomobami[edit]

Kikiramomobami (talk) 02:49, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Duplicate - there is an open pending question just above this one Nosebagbear (talk) 14:05, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

04:28:19, 17 September 2019 review of submission by Gameofdrones967[edit]

I believe the article ascribes to Wikipedia's 5 pillars and is worth adding to Wikipedia for a few reasons. It is sufficiently important, being a growing creator in Eugene, Oregon it helps to flush out the cities growing community. Additionally, it is written from a neutral point of view and stands to record facts and events. If any aspect is biased, feel free to edit. I believe this page will grow significantly in the coming years and would help tremendously to have a starting point for people to continually edit.

Gameofdrones967 (talk) 04:28, 17 September 2019 (UTC) the rejection notice says "This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia" Theroadislong (talk) 07:41, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

04:35:49, 17 September 2019 review of submission by Gameofdrones967[edit]

I believe this article is sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia since it is the groundwork for a growing creator in Oregon. The current article is a jumping-off point for other members of the community to add to once more notable achievements are made. Gameofdrones967 (talk) 04:35, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Request on 04:52:18, 17 September 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Maren Rosenberg[edit]

Maren Rosenberg (talk) 04:52, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

06:09:36, 17 September 2019 review of submission by 2001:4408:4401:1F:4A1A:6980:3198:412F[edit]

Kindly review the Draft:Ji_Golpor_Ses_Nai again as the film is an important part of history of Assamese Cinema, deserves to be included in Wikipedia. Thanks 2001:4408:4401:1F:4A1A:6980:3198:412F (talk) 06:09, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Rejection is meant to be final, to convey that the topic is not notable (not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). The draft has been examined by five experienced Wikipedians, all of whom reached the same basic conclusion. Volunteers do not intend to review it again unless something fundamental changes, such as the film being released. If it's an important part of the history of Assamese Cinema, then when books are written about that history, the film will be discussed therein. Wikipedia may not be used for advertising, promotion, or public relations. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:35, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

13:15:16, 17 September 2019 review of submission by[edit]

Hi! I need help understanding what specific changes I should make to the page in order to meet Wikipedia's guidelines. The reason for its decline stated that it "should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources," and as you'll see, I included 16 entirely independent, highly reputable sources -- none of which included content produced by or for the company. Additionally, when modeling this submission, I took careful pains to ensure it matched the near-exact format of other published Wikipedia pages (such as Rent_the_Runway and Hims,_Inc.). So I'm really unsure as to what I should be editing. The more specific guidance, the better! I welcome any & all feedback. Thank you! (talk) 13:15, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

17:34:06, 17 September 2019 review of draft by[edit]

This morning, my draft was declined with the comment "This submission appears to be a news report of a single event and may not be notable enough for an article in Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:NOT#NEWS and Wikipedia:ONEEVENT for more information." My draft was declined even after the changes I made between 04:11 and 04:20 today. I don't know how this draft still reads like a news report. To the best of my knowledge, I do not use relative time-sensitive words such as "yesterday," "last week," and "recently" as I would if this were written in news style. As I mentioned on the draft's talk page, I believe the content of my draft focuses more on the disappearance of the person than it does on the person herself. The event seems to meet the notability guidelines at Wikipedia:EVENT. As demonstrated by the references present in the draft, the event has been covered by various news sources at different times in the last ten years, so it does not appear to be a "routine kind of news event." (talk) 17:34, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

20:14:40, 17 September 2019 review of submission by Srcollier94[edit]

I am working on creating an article for the Archivists and Archives of Color Roundtable. Most of my sources come from the SAA, which is problematic, but I have been trying to fill it with other notable secondary sources. I absolutely believe this is an important group that deserves its own wikipedia page, as it has encouraged the growth of diversity among archivists and archives across the United States. If there are any suggestions on some good secondary sources, that would be helpful, or even just a quick read-through of what I have so far would be incredibly helpful. Thanks! Srcollier94 (talk) 20:14, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi Srcollier94. Thank you for your interest in improving the encyclopedia. You are correct that being sourced mainly from SAA is problematic. The bulk of any article should come from independent sources. Don't confuse being worthy of support with having been taken note of by the world at large. Many, many organizations do excellent and worthwhile work, but are not suitable subjects for an encyclopedia article. I recommend setting the topic aside and improving Wikipedia in other ways. See the Community portal for how to help. --Worldbruce (talk) 03:55, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Request on 21:25:36, 17 September 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Ballroad[edit]

I'm new and would like to know the proper way to construct the article I'm trying to publish. Where did I go wrong and what is exactly do I need to create a proper article. Did I insert something against Wikipedia?

Ballroad (talk) 21:25, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

This question has been asked and responded to at the Teahouse. see here

Nick Moyes (talk) 23:08, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

September 18[edit]

03:29:12, 18 September 2019 review of submission by Lifelonglearning1[edit]

{{Lafc|username=Lifelonglearning1|ts=03:29:12, 18 September 2019|page= — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lifelonglearning1 (talkcontribs)

Request on 04:42:45, 18 September 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Ada Wan[edit]

Hi Wiki, I do not understand why this article is being rejected because it is not significant enough. As I see Wikipedia is a platform to share knowledge and information and there always will be some topics or articles that are not interesting or significant for others. Please assist me. Thank you.

Ada Wan (talk) 04:42, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

On hold pending paid editing disclosure, see User talk:Ada Wan#Declare any connection. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:11, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

05:52:13, 18 September 2019 review of submission by Ka1591915[edit]

I would like to request assistance with this page because the topic covers a prominent cultural practitioner of the Hawaiian community who deserves to have his story told. Could I please receive some additional information as to why this was rejected? Ka1591915 (talk) 05:52, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

@Ka1591915: - it was rejected because the sources weren't suitable. To prove notability you need sources that are: in-depth, reliable, independent (which also rules out interviews) and secondary (newspapers, books etc). The Genealogy documents, the census and kaananiau's site are all primary, and also aren't in-depth (on Nunes himself) or fail independent (in the case of the site). The interview is also not independent because most of the content would come from a non-independent source. The obituary causes warnings to crop up all over my laptop so I've not seen that, but even as a good source, it wouldn't be enough on its own. Have a look at WP:GNG for a good summary of what you need. Nosebagbear (talk) 16:06, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

06:12:57, 18 September 2019 review of draft by MaroonFrogbh[edit]

The following article is an introduction to readers to know about Al Salam Bank in Bahrain. and all the information in the article are informative and does not advertise anything related to Al Salam Bank. Could you kindly advice me on how can I improve the article pleas. Thank you! MaroonFrogbh (talk) 06:12, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

MaroonFrogbh Greetings. May I know what is your connection with the bank? CASSIOPEIA(talk) 14:07, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

This is Anwaar from We are a Marketing Agency based in Bahrain. Our client Alsalam Bank Bahrain has asked us to create online content on Wikipedia & the top online directories and other websites. This is the first time we create a Wikipedia page and we are not sure how we can do it right to get accepted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MaroonFrogbh (talkcontribs) 05:48, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

@MaroonFrogbh: Post the mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:MaroonFrogbh. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=MaroonFrogbh|employer=Maroon Frog|client=Alsalam Bank Bahrain}}. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:22, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

06:31:34, 18 September 2019 review of submission by Chirag-Behre[edit]


Thank you for your feedback. We have added a few reliable links for the content as reference.

Regards, Chirag-Behre (talk) 06:31, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

13:38:18, 18 September 2019 review of submission by Briannaburns123[edit]

Here is the code I submitted that was denied, can anyone give me any advice? 

[copy of draft removed, the link above is sufficient --Worldbruce (talk) 14:21, 18 September 2019 (UTC)]

Briannaburns123 (talk) 13:38, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

@Briannaburns123: Please read the declination reason at the top of your draft, as it contains helpful links for you to improve your draft. JTP (talkcontribs) 18:21, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

19:12:11, 18 September 2019 review of submission by Shaikh7977741665[edit]

@Shaikh7977741665: - Wikipedia isn't a "how-to" guide (WikiHow might work), but also the tone isn't correct - we don't use "We" or "our". There's also a concern that this would be a US-centric article: documents would range heavily region to region. Finally the article doesn't have any references. Nosebagbear (talk) 19:55, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
@Nosebagbear and Shaikh7977741665: and I don't think anyone will accept Copyright violations. 09:08, 19 September 2019 RHaworth talk contribs deleted page User:Shaikh7977741665/sandbox (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of (thank) Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 09:40, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Indeed! Nosebagbear (talk)

19:12:11, 18 September 2019 review of draft by Shaikh7977741665[edit]

Shaikh7977741665 (talk) 19:12, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Please see the above Nosebagbear (talk)

20:43:01, 18 September 2019 review of submission by Shaikh7977741665[edit]

Shaikh7977741665 (talk) 20:43, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

23:19:38, 18 September 2019 review of draft by SamanGorilla[edit]

I think this article is being denied unfairly and the reason for denial is totally personal. I need a second eye for it.

SamanGorilla (talk) 23:19, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi SamanGorilla. Most companies, including Elago, are not notable (not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 00:32, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Briannaburns123 (talk) 00:25, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

00:35:20, 19 September 2019 review of submission by Briannaburns123[edit]

I don't understand the "declination reason" for my article submission denial, can someone actually give me some help in the help desk? Help that I can actually understand so that I can correct it? Can anyone help me? Briannaburns123 (talk) 00:35, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

@Briannaburns123: - of course. Inline citations are the little blue numbers that appear at the end of sentences in many articles (e.g. Fairness Project). In most articles, they are only needed for potentially controversial or disputable statements or quotes. However, for biographies of living persons, stricter rules apply. Any potentially contentious material, at all, needs to have an inline citation.
Conveniently, you've already written your sources in a suitable format. I've cut the first one from the bottom and used it as an inline ref.
It's worth knowing you can name references. For example, I've named the example inline reference so it reads <ref name="De La Soul"> at the start of the citation. If you want to use that reference again, elsewhere in the article, you just need to write <ref name="De La Soul"/> instead of writing out the whole citation again. Nosebagbear (talk) 08:49, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

September 19[edit]

01:47:11, 19 September 2019 review of submission by MikeyMikeyMike[edit]

MikeyMikeyMike (talk) 01:47, 19 September 2019 (UTC)


I was provided this reason why the article I submitted wasn't approved:

Is it purely a judgement call if a topic is notable?

What tips can you provide in order for the article to be published?

If the topic isn't notable, which article should I incorporate my article into?

@MikeyMikeyMike: - notability is a general policy that applies to Wikipedia. There are specific guidelines for various topics. Companies and organisations use corporate notability.
If a draft/article is on the edge of notability it can be a judgement call, but a clearcut rejection that this received (and supported by me) is fully in line with the rules.
Firstly, you've used external links, whereas references should be one of the various methods you can see at referencing for beginners
I did however look at all of them. And all the sources/links failed on 1 of the 4 requirements for any source designed to show notability: reliable (generally reliable publication with editorial control); independent (no reason to be biased, such as an involved writer, or interviews); significant coverage about Engin itself (roughly 10+ lines that aren't quotes); secondary (newspapers, books etc). The corporate notability link above has a good explanation of each.
I'm not sure there is enough sourcing available to be found to demonstrate corporate notability Nosebagbear (talk) 08:57, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Request on 03:01:02, 19 September 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Ada Wan[edit]

I wrote an article on Wikipedia and it got rejected. The reason is because the article is not significant enough for inclusion on wikipedia. However, Wikipedia is a platform for many topics and articles, there will always be articles that will not be significant or important, if my article get rejected because it is not significant to the person who reject it, then I think its sort of unreasonable to do. Ada Wan (talk) 03:01, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

On hold pending paid editing disclosure, see User talk:Ada Wan#Declare any connection. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:13, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
@Ada Wan: Thank you for your declaration. Most businesses, including APM Monaco, are not notable (not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 12:21, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

05:50:21, 19 September 2019 review of submission by LoLo0732[edit]

I request to edit draft:Johann_Brieger since he is a notable Austrian diplomat. The creator of the original topic did not offer major citations of media coverage besides primary sources and a shortened CV. Nevertheless, there is more than enough international media coverage that justifies an English wikipedia article.

Therefore, I want to reopen the article and add further sources, for example - by the government of Mauritius about Dr. Briegers recent visit: - by an independent Mauritius newspaper about Dr. Briegers recent visit: - an article by The Diplomatic Society about one of his hosted events: - an article by the South African Development Community: - an article by

Thank you & best regards

LoLo0732 (talk) 05:50, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

06:10:48, 19 September 2019 review of submission by[edit]

This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. what kind of citation needed (talk) 06:10, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

10:43:33, 19 September 2019 review of submission by Juanestebanp94[edit]

After the notice of rejection of the contribution, I did a complete review of the content, structure and references. It pretends to tell what is the history and contributions of software to the world.

I am asking for a revision in order to get the necessary approval to appear on Wikipedia, thank you.

Juanestebanp94 (talk) 10:43, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

It appears to be blatant advertising. Theroadislong (talk) 11:01, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

17:48:43, 19 September 2019 review of draft by Oilisgood[edit]

We have a page for the Barjeel Art Foundation in the UAE and it has been denied publishing. I am trying to figure out what is wrong with the submission. The guidelines say to make sure it uses sources from multiple sources outside of the foundation. It appears we have and I do not know what is wrong on this front. Some references to name a few in the page are: - The National - The Guardian - New York Times - Whitechapel Gallery - Myart Guides - MORI Art Museum - Sharjha Museums - Casa Arabe - NYU Abu Dhabi

I am also trying to figure out what the difference that delineates something being an advertisement and it being a wikipedia page. The page should contain information about the foundation and what they do. The page contains facts and no opinions. So, I am unsure what the issue is.

Is it structure? Should we break things up into more list and categories? I am really at a dead end on where to go from here. :(

Thanks for your time and consideration on this issue.

Oilisgood (talk) 17:48, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi Oilisgood. Please clarify what you mean by "we". Do you have a connection to the foundation that you have not disclosed? --Worldbruce (talk) 19:25, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi Worldbruce. My connection to the foundation is that I took a class from Sultan Al-Qassim a few years ago at NYU and I do see him at events in the art world from time to time. But, I do not work with nor collaborate with him. I meant the we in the sense of people like me who are passionate about Modern Arab Art. (I'm a Cloud DevOps Manager at my day job) I am unsure how this content is going to get populated and out there if not by people who carry interest in the subject matter at hand. I would not want all of my Modern Arab Art information to come from someone who has zero connection to the Arab Art world. I can understand your concern about me being paid to do this. But, I promise you it strictly comes from a passion in the field. And the Barjeel is a very important piece of the puzzle that is the Arab Art World in general. It is a central hub for many people who navigate this area of the art world. I'd like to see it have a page so that it can be referenced when linking up different artists and their work. No compensation, no kickbacks. Just passion and interest. I don't know how else to say it.

September 20[edit]

00:06:30, 20 September 2019 review of submission by Talkfir[edit]

hi, i wanted to know, why u declined my page psybient, and psychill? lot of people dont know this, so i want that it will be exist, so they can learn more... thanks tal

Talkfir (talk) 00:06, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi Talkfir. Draft:Psybient was declined because it is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The encyclopedia is not the place to "get the word out" about anything. --Worldbruce (talk) 03:41, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

06:15:14, 20 September 2019 review of draft by Tonysy191[edit]

Hello! Good day!

I would like to ask for more information or help, so that I can publish this draft of mine? Your feedback will be gladly appreciated.

Thank you!

Tonysy191 (talk) 06:15, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

07:48:50, 20 September 2019 review of submission by Dickel1[edit]

I want to make edits on the article in order to respect Wikipedia terms and conditions. This was my first time posting an article and I was still not comfortable with the referencing part. I want to try again.

Could you please let me do the required edits?

Thank you Dickel1 (talk) 07:48, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

10:32:28, 20 September 2019 review of submission by Chirag-Behre[edit]

Hello Team,

As suggested by the team, we have made a few changes by adding some strong and reliable source of reference articles in the draft. I request the team to go through the updated draft and let us know your view on it.

Thank You! Chirag-Behre (talk) 10:32, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Who is "we', Wikipedia accounts are strictly for single person use, please declare any conflict of interest. Theroadislong (talk) 10:42, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

14:58:03, 20 September 2019 review of submission by MS KHAN K[edit]

MS KHAN K (talk) 14:58, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a venue for hosting your CV I'm afraid (like most of us) you are not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 15:48, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

16:11:46, 20 September 2019 review of submission by Bharat1[edit]

On what basis we have this article created:

Bharat1 (talk) 16:11, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

16:42:05, 20 September 2019 review of draft by Francis schichtel[edit]

Dear Wikipedia:

This wikipedia entry has been waiting to be posted for many more than 8 weeks. Is there some problem? Is there anything I can do to speed up this process?

Thank you Francis

Francis schichtel (talk) 16:42, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

18:47:36, 20 September 2019 review of draft by Kenpj[edit]

My project has been reviewed once. When will it be approved?

Kenpj (talk) 18:47, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

@Kenpj: - this specific draft doesn't seem to have been reviewed before. In any case, it was submitted at the beginning of july - about 11 weeks ago. There are drafts 6 weeks older, as the submission rate is so much higher than it was last year. Nosebagbear (talk) 19:41, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

19:44:38, 20 September 2019 review of draft by Harrylangham[edit]

I want to know whether my article on Jean Jones has been submitted for review. Harrylangham (talk) 19:44, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

No it hasn't... you need to click the blue box that says "Submit your draft for review". Theroadislong (talk) 21:36, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

23:31:25, 20 September 2019 review of submission by Wikicraigbez[edit]

Hi, I made changes to address all of the reviewer comments and thought I resubmitted for a re-review. This is my first article so I'm not familiar with the system. It's not clear to me what state the article is in. Is it in the queue to re-review or do I need to do something else to get that to happen? Thanks. - Craig Wikicraigbez (talk) 23:31, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

September 21[edit]