|Supreme Court of Florida|
|Country||Florida , United States|
|Composition method||Gubernatorial appointment|
|Authorized by||Florida Constitution|
|Decisions are appealed to||Supreme Court of the United States only for federal issues; otherwise cases cannot be appealed.|
|Judge term length||6 years|
|No. of positions||7|
|Currently||Charles T. Canady|
|Since||July 1, 2018|
|Lead position ends||June 30, 2020|
|This article is part of a series on the|
politics and government of
The Supreme Court of Florida is the highest court in the U.S. state of Florida. It consists of seven members—the Chief Justice and six Justices. Five members are chosen from five districts around the state to foster geographic diversity and two are selected at-large.
The Justices are appointed by the Governor to set terms that do not exceed six years. Immediately after appointment, the initial term is three years or less, because the Justices must appear on the ballot in the next general election that occurs more than one year after their appointment. Afterward they serve six-year terms and remain in office if retained in the general election near the end of each term. Citizens vote on whether they want to retain each Justice in office, or not.
Chief Justices are elected by the members of the Court to two-year terms that end in every even-numbered year. Chief Justices can succeed themselves in office if re-elected by the other Justices.
The Court is the final arbiter of Florida law, and its decisions are binding authority for all other Florida state courts and for federal courts when they apply Florida law. In most instances, the only appeal from the Florida Supreme Court is to the U.S. Supreme Court on questions of federal law.
Established upon statehood in 1845, the court is headquartered across Duval Street from the state capitol in Tallahassee. Throughout the court's history it has undergone many reorganizations as Florida's population has grown. The Florida Supreme Court has heard many historic cases, most notably the 2000 presidential election Florida recount case Bush v. Gore.
- 1 History
- 2 Powers
- 3 Organization
- 4 Notable cases and precedent
- 5 See also
- 6 References
- 7 External links
After Florida's entrance into the union in 1845, and the ratification of the State's first Constitution, the Supreme Court of the State of Florida was born. It is the successor to the Florida Territorial Court of Appeals and the court system that existed under Spain prior to the acquisition of Florida through the Adams-Onis Treaty. Though the constitution created a Supreme Court, it vested it with no judges and little power. Florida Circuit Court judges served in the capacity of Supreme Court Justices until 1851 when an 1848 constitutional amendment took effect granting the state legislature power to choose three justices. In 1853, another constitutional amendment was adopted that provided for the popular election of Justices to serve six-year terms.
Following the Civil War and the adoption of the 1868 Constitution, Justices were appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the State Senate. In 1885, the state returned to elected justices. In 1940, the court's membership was finally increased to its current size of seven members, and a 1926 constitutional amendment provided that the Chief Justice should be elected by the Justices of the Court. A two-year term for the Chief Justice was established by the Rules of Court adopted by the Supreme Court, with each term beginning on July 1 of even-numbered years and ending on June 30 in the next even-numbered year.
In the early 1970s, more than half the justices resigned over various corruption probes.
In 1976, the state returned to appointed justices when the current merit retention system was put in place.
In 2004, the court had a backlog of 1,544 cases. In 2011, there was a backlog of 881 cases.
The jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of Florida is laid out in Article V of the Florida Constitution. The Court follows the common law and since its first case, Stewart v. Preston (1846), has published its opinions, first in official law reports called the Florida Reports and more recently in the Southern Series edited by West Publishing.
The Supreme Court of Florida has appellate jurisdiction that is discretionary (cases the Court may choose to hear if it wishes) in most cases and mandatory (cases the court must hear) in a few cases. In some matters, the Court has original jurisdiction, meaning that the case can begin and end in the Supreme Court absent a basis for further appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States. The Court also has some forms of exclusive jurisdiction, meaning that it is the only court or government body that can decide the issue.
The Florida Constitution, Article V, (3)(b)(1), establishes mandatory jurisdiction for the following:
- Cases in which the death penalty is imposed (but solely to review findings of lower courts on the law, not on the facts). In such instances, the Florida Supreme Court directly reviews Florida Circuit Court decisions, skipping the intermediate Florida District Courts of Appeal (DCAs).
- Decisions by the DCAs declaring invalid a state statute or constitutional provision.
- The Florida Constitution, Article V, (3)(b)(2), permits the Florida Legislature to provide for mandatory jurisdiction in the following two circumstances (the legislature has so provided):
- For final judgments on proceedings for validation of bonds or certificates of indebtedness. Here again, the Florida Supreme Court directly reviews circuit court decisions.
- For review of action of statewide agencies relating to rates or service of electric, gas, and telephone utilities.
- DCA decisions expressly declaring a state statute or constitutional provision to be valid (as opposed to invalid, which as stated above places the appellate court decision under mandatory jurisdiction)
- DCA decisions that expressly affects a class of constitutional/state officers
- DCA decisions that expressly and directly conflict with the decision of another DCA or of the Florida Supreme Court (including decisions that the DCA certifies to be in conflict with an opinion of another DCA)
- DCA decisions that the DCA certifies, or orders or judgments of trial courts certified by a DCA in which appeal is pending, to be of "great public importance", or to have a great effect on the proper administration of justice throughout the state, and certified to require immediate resolution by the Supreme Court
- Questions of law certified by the Supreme Court of the United States or a United States court of appeals as determinative of a cause before them, for which there is no controlling precedent by the Florida Supreme Court.
Original nonexclusive jurisdiction
The Florida Constitution further grants the Supreme Court original nonexclusive jurisdiction over certain matters. "Original" means that the case can begin and end in the state Supreme Court absent a basis for further appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. "Nonexclusive" means that these matters do not absolutely have to begin in the Supreme Court, but also could originate in a lower court. The bulk of matters falling within this category often are called the "extraordinary writs" and include habeas corpus, mandamus, quo warranto, and the writ of prohibition.
Finally, the Supreme Court has exclusive jurisdiction over some other matters. "Exclusive" means that the Florida Supreme Court is the only court or governmental body that can resolve the issue. This category includes regulation of the Florida Bar, regulation of admissions to the Bar, creating and amending the Florida Rules of Court, and determining whether the Governor is incapacitated and thus unable to fulfill the duties of office. It also includes two forms of jurisdiction to issue advisory opinions. The Court can provide an advisory opinion upon a request by the Governor to address uncertainties about legal issues involving the executive branch's powers. It also can issue advisory opinions to the Florida Attorney General about citizens' initiatives to amend the state Constitution. However, for this last type of advisory opinion, the Court only determines whether the citizens' initiative meets two legal requirements: its ballot summary fairly advises the voters of its effect; and it only contains a single subject. A negative advisory opinion removes non-conforming initiatives from the ballot.
The Supreme Court also has the duty to review legislative redistricting after each decennial Census. After the Florida Legislature enacts a joint resolution reapportioning the State House and Senate, the plan is presented to the Supreme Court on a petition filed by the Florida Attorney General. The Supreme Court's review of an apportionment plan created by the Legislature is guided by several standards specified in the Constitution, including new ones added to the Constitution by the voters in 2010 that prohibit gerrymandering. If the Legislature fails to initially pass a reapportionment plan or fails to enact a remedial plan after its primary plan is rejected by the Supreme Court, then the Court has the duty to apportion the State.
The Supreme Court also has the authority to impose discipline on state judges for ethical breaches, which can range from a public televised reprimand to removal from office.
The Court is composed of the Chief Justice and six Justices, who all serve six-year staggered terms. The Justices elect the Chief Justice from amongst themselves. Justices must be an elector (a qualified, registered voter) of the state and must have been a member in good standing of the Florida Bar for at least ten years. The Court must have at least one justice who resided in each of Florida's five lower appellate districts on the date of their appointment. They must retire on their 70th birthday unless it falls within the second half of their six-year terms. In that event, they can remain in office until the end of the full term. Amendment 6 passed in 2018 raised the mandatory retirement age for justices to 75, effective July 1, 2019.
At least five Justices must be present for the Court to carry out its official functions, and at least four Justices must agree on decisions issued by the Court. The Chief Justice can assign judges of the lower courts to serve as temporary Justices (called "Associate Justices" under Florida Rules of Court) if the need arises. Under the Court's Internal Operations Procedures Manual, the appointment of Associate Justices rotates among the chief judges of the district courts of appeal in their numerical order, from one to five, and then starts over again. The intent behind this procedure is to eliminate any concern that temporary Associate Justices are appointed because of their personal views on legal issues.
The Court holds two terms each year, with the first commencing on the first day of January and the second beginning on the first day of July.
Appointment, retention and impeachment
A relatively complex appointment process (a modified form of the "Missouri Plan") is set forth in the Florida Constitution, which requires the creation of a Judicial Nominating Commission composed of persons appointed to staggered four-year terms, representing various interests. The Commission must submit to the Governor of Florida between three and six names for each vacancy on the court, from which the Governor selects the new Justice. The Governor's selection is final and requires no further approval by any governmental body. Up until 1971 when merit selection was implemented, judges were chosen by direct election of the people. In 1974, Justice Ben Overton became the first Supreme Court justice chosen by merit selection.
Justices must meet three requirements to qualify for appointment to the Court: they must be an elector (a qualified, registered voter) of the state, they must reside in the territorial jurisdiction of the state when they assume office, and they must be under 70 years of age.
After appointment, the new Justice must face statewide voters in the next general election that is more than one year after the date of initial appointment. In this "merit retention" election, voters decide only if the new Justice will remain in office. If not retained in office, the Governor appoints a replacement through the same Judicial Nominating Commission process. After this first merit retention election, Justices face the voters in the same type of merit retention election every six years thereafter until they leave or reach retirement age.
Following a constitutional amendment passed by referendum in November 2018, the mandatory retirement age is set at 75 as of July 1, 2019. Previously, the mandatory retirement age had been determined by a method set forth in Article V, section 8 of the Florida Constitution. According to this method, if a Justice reached age 70 in the first half of the six-year term, then they had to retire on their 70th birthday, but otherwise the Justice could remain until the end of the six-year term. For example, Justice James E.C. Perry reached the retirement age of 70 in 2014, during the second half of his then-current term, making him eligible to remain until his full term expired two years later, which he did. The new constitutional amendment removes this right to remain in office past the retirement age.
Justices may be removed by one of two methods. They can be disciplined upon the recommendation of the Judicial Qualifications Commission, at which time the Court may remove a Justice or impose a lesser penalty such as a fine or reprimand; and Justices may be impeached by a two-thirds vote of the Florida House of Representatives and convicted by a two-thirds vote of the senate.
|Name||Appointed||Chief Justice||Term expires||Mandatory retirement||Appointing Governor|
|Charles T. Canady||August 28, 2008||2010–2012 |
|2023||June 22, 2029||Charlie Crist, Republican|
|Ricky Polston||October 1, 2008||2012–2014||2023||November 24, 2030||Charlie Crist, Republican|
|Jorge Labarga||January 2, 2009||2014–2018||2023||October 21, 2027||Charlie Crist, Republican|
|C. Alan Lawson||December 31, 2016||—||2025||May 12, 2036||Rick Scott, Republican|
|Barbara Lagoa||January 9, 2019||—||2021||November 2, 2042||Ron DeSantis, Republican|
|Robert J. Luck||January 14, 2019||—||2021||March 17, 2054||Ron DeSantis, Republican|
|Carlos G. Muñiz||January 22, 2019||—||2021||June 25, 2044||Ron DeSantis, Republican|
Notable cases and precedent
State and local cases
In 1999, a dissenting opinion by Justice Leander J. Shaw, Jr. sparked a worldwide debate over the use of Old Sparky, Florida's electric chair, which helped lead to events that caused the Florida Legislature to adopt lethal injection as the state's method of execution only a few months later.
In 2004, the court struck down another piece of legislation from the Florida legislature that was designed to reverse a lower court decision in the Terri Schiavo case.
In 2006, the Court struck down a law passed by the Florida legislature that had created the first statewide education voucher program in the United States. That same year in Engle v. Liggett Group, it also ordered decertification of a class action lawsuit against big tobacco companies that effectively reversed the largest punitive damage jury award, $145 billion, in U.S. history.
In 2013, Governor Rick Scott signed the Timely Justice Act (HB 7101) which overhauled the processes for capital punishment. The United States Supreme Court struck down part of this law in January 2016 in Hurst v. Florida, declaring that a judge determining the aggravating facts to be used in considering a death sentence with only a non-binding recommendation from the jury based on a majority vote was insufficient and violated the Sixth Amendment guarantee of a jury trial. The Florida legislature passed a new statute to comply with the judgement in March 2016, changing the sentencing method to require a 10-juror supermajority for a sentence of death with a life sentence as the alternative. This new sentencing scheme was struck down by the Florida Supreme Court in a ruling 5–2 in October 2016, which held that a death sentence must be issued by a unanimous jury. The United States Supreme Court later left this decision undisturbed. Governor Scott in early 2017 signed a new law requiring a unanimous jury.
2000 presidential election
In the 2000 presidential election controversy, the Supreme Court of the United States overturned the Florida Supreme Court after it had ordered a statewide recount. Notably, arguments before the Florida Supreme Court in the 2000 presidential election cases were the first appellate court proceedings in history broadcast live in their entirety on major television networks in the United States and throughout the world. An estimated one-quarter of the entire fleet of satellite trucks used by broadcasters in North America was present in Tallahassee at the height of the controversy. These events later were dramatized in the 2008 HBO movie Recount. Former Chief Justice Charles T. Wells, who presided over the two historic cases argued at the state highest court, has authored a first person account of the controversy in Inside Bush v. Gore released in April 2013.
- Florida Constitution
- Florida Democratic Party
- Government of Florida
- Judiciary of Florida
- List of Justices of the Florida Supreme Court
- Republican Party of Florida
- Florida's Legal & Judicial System Guide to Florida Law
- The Florida Supreme Court – About the Court Supreme Court of Florida
- Judges, with Hat in Hand; by the Editorial Board, 19 January 2015, New York Times
- "AROUND THE NATION - Ex-Florida Court Justice Accused in Drug Case - NYTimes.com". 27 September 1982. Retrieved 12 January 2015.
- Royce, David (January 1, 2013). "Ex-high justice, 85, dies". Florida Today. Melbourne, Florida. pp. 10B.
- "Editorial:Crushing the courts". Florida Today. Melbourne, Florida. April 3, 2011. pp. 18A.
- The Operation and Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of Florida Nova Law Review. Nova Southeastern University.
- "Mandatory retirement is forcing out Florida judges". Tampa Bay Times. Retrieved 12 January 2015.
- Public Information – Florida's State Court System Supreme Court of Florida
- Methods of Judicial Selection – Removal of Judges American Judicature Society
- Succession of Justices of Supreme Court of Florida Supreme Court of Florida
- See http://www.dailybusinessreview.com/id=1202744805640/Leander-Shaw-Floridas-First-AfricanAmerican-Chief-Justice-Dies-at-85&curindex=6
- see also http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/florida/fl-ap-leander-shaw-20151214-story.html
- "HB 7101". Flsenate.gov. Florida State Senate. Retrieved March 15, 2016.
- Klas, Mary Ellen (June 14, 2016). "Gov. Rick Scott signs bill to speed up executions in Florida". Miami Herald. Retrieved October 15, 2016.
- Liptak, Adam (January 12, 2016). "Supreme Court Strikes Down Part of Florida Death Penalty". The New York Times. Retrieved February 3, 2016.
- Alvarez, Lizette (February 2, 2016). "Supreme Court Ruling Has Florida Scrambling to Fix Death Penalty Law". The New York Times. Retrieved February 3, 2016.
- Berman, Mark (March 7, 2016). "Florida death penalty officially revamped after Supreme Court struck it down". Washington Post. Retrieved August 3, 2016.
- Klas, Mary Ellen; Ovalle, David (October 14, 2016). "Court again tosses state death penalty; ruling raises bar on capital punishment". Miami Herald. Retrieved October 15, 2016.
- "Justices Reject Florida Appeal Over Death Penalty". U.S. News & World Report. May 22, 2017. Retrieved June 15, 2017.
- "Florida Tightens Death Penalty Law to Require Unanimous Jury Recommendation". U.S. News & World Report. March 13, 2017. Retrieved June 15, 2017.
- "Technological Transparency" (PDF). Retrieved 17 December 2016.
- HBO: Recount: synopsis Home Box Office
- "Inside Bush v. Gore". Archived from the original on 20 December 2014. Retrieved 12 January 2015.